![]() ![]() "There is no right more sacred than life, and nothing more worthy of our strongest defense than the innocent unborn," Reynolds said in a statement Friday. She did not immediately say whether she intends to do so. As governor, Reynolds has the power to call lawmakers back to Des Moines sooner for a special session. The next legislative session will begin in January. Leaders said they were waiting for the Supreme Court's decision before introducing any new abortion laws. Republican majorities in the House and Senate did not take action on abortion in the 2023 session. "Going forward we will work together to pass legislation that will protect life, support new mothers, and promote strong families in Iowa," Grassley said. House Speaker Pat Grassley said in a Friday statement that the 2018 law was "a good piece of legislation that would save the innocent lives of unborn children." The Iowa Republicans who control the Legislature have been vocal opponents of abortion, and they will likely pass new laws restricting the procedure. ![]() What happens next for Iowa's abortion laws? Individuals seeking an abortion in Iowa must have an initial appointment with the provider, then wait at least 24 hours before undergoing the procedure. Under current Iowa law, abortion is prohibited after 20 weeks of pregnancy, measured as 22 weeks after the mother's last menstrual period. What are Iowa's current abortion laws?įriday's ruling does not change abortion laws in Iowa. Without a majority opinion, a district court's decision blocking the law remains in effect. The Iowa Supreme Court was evenly divided on the case.Įach side issued scathing opinions: Justice Thomas Waterman wrote that allowing the law to take effect would be "legislating from the bench," while Justice Christopher McDonald, in the opposing opinion, said his colleagues had acted as "a three-person super general assembly" by saying the law should remain blocked. What did the Iowa Supreme Court say about abortion? Here's what you need to know about abortion laws in Iowa. Her former law firm represents one of the parties in the case.īecause the justices were evenly divided, the district judge's order was affirmed, meaning the law will remain permanently blocked. The would-be tie-breaker, Justice Dana Oxley, recused herself. A district court had blocked the 2018 law before it ever took effect.įriday's Supreme Court opinions were split, with three justices arguing that lifting the injunction would be unprecedented and that it should remain in place, and three arguing the injunction should be lifted so that the law could go into effect. ![]() Kim Reynolds had asked the courts to reconsider the so-called fetal heartbeat law, which would have banned most abortions after the first cardiac impulses were detected in an embryo. ![]() Wade, the landmark case that legalized abortion nationally. Abortion remains legal in Iowa after the Iowa Supreme Court on Friday deadlocked on whether to reinstate a 2018 law that would have banned most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.įriday's decision - or lack thereof - comes almost exactly one year after the Iowa Supreme Court declared Iowa's constitution does not protect a fundamental right to an abortion. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |